fbpx
The S&P 500 Index Historical Returns

The S&P 500 Index Historical Returns

Advertiser Disclosure: Opinions, reviews, analyses, and recommendations are the author's alone, and have not been reviewed, endorsed or approved by any other entity. This site may be compensated through the advertiser affiliate program.

The S&P 500 is one of the largest barometers of overall stock market performance available; the index is comprised of 500 of the largest and leading companies on the market today. The original S&P index debuted in 1927 with 233 stocks and did not expand to the current 500 companies until 1957. Many investors that seek diversification will look to S&P 500 index mutual funds. By “owning the index” you spread your funds out across a very large swath of companies.

The S&P 500 Index Historical Returns 1

But before you jump into any investment, even if it is the S&P 500, you should know how it has performed in the past. With the S&P 500 finding the historical rate of return is surprisingly difficult to do.

How to Calculate the Historical Return of the S&P 500

To figure out what the index has returned over a period of time, you need two things: the historical data and the proper math.

The Data

The problem with looking for the historical return of the S&P 500 is finding the actual historical data to run the calculations. Unless you subscribe to a service from Standard and Poor’s, finding true data can be quite tricky.

There are a few places you can find mostly complete and well presented data:

However, as robust as this data is, you must be careful about the accuracy of some online data. You will find some spreadsheets that date back to the 1870’s. Considering the S&P index didn’t debut until 1927 and didn’t reach 500 companies until 1957, there are assumptions baked into numbers previous to that. Stick with more traditional data for your calculations.

The Math

Once you have the data, you can’t necessarily just do an average of all of the returns. There are multiple methodologies you can use: median, mean, compound annual growth rate (CAGR), and so on.

There is a great CAGR calculator available at moneychimp. The CAGR calculator shows you what the simple average is over a given time period and what the more accurate (and usually lower by 1-2%) CAGR for the same time period is. (It should be noted that the returns also include dividend payments as part of the overall return.)

What is the Average Return of the S&P 500?

Utilizing the CAGR method, the average return of the S&P 500 from January 1, 1957 to December 2011 is 9.62%. (This is lower than the simple average of 11.12%.) With a 9.62% return, $1 invested in 1957 would be worth $156.57 today.

Is the S&P 500’s return always going to be 9.62%? Absolutely not. The index has had years with a positive return of 43.40% (1958) and others where it dropped 37.22% (2008). What is more important is what it will return during your investment time period, but historical averages are not an indicator of future performance.

On average you should be able to expect a healthy return in the 5-9% range with a long enough investment horizon. However, the CAGR for the last decade (January 2002 to December 2011) is only 2.87%.

Use Dollar Cost Averaging to Avoid Performance Concerns

The natural tendency for the average investor is to get into stocks when prices are going up and jump out of the market when things turn south. This is perfectly opposite of what the smart investor does: buys stocks when they go on sale and sells stocks when they are overpriced.

But it can be hard to know when stocks are over or underpriced. To avoid worrying about what the average return of an index is, simplify your finances by consistently investing into the index with dollar cost averaging. When the S&P 500 soars your money will buy fewer shares than it does when the stock market tanks. Overall you will pay a lower price per share of an index than if you let your emotions drive.

Using dollar cost averaging can help offset poorly performing runs of the stock market. Many performance averages assume you had 100% of your money in the investment at the beginning and end of the period. This is not how investing works for a majority of investors: you build up your assets over time. So while the CAGR of the last decade is just shy of 3%, your performance could be significantly higher if you maintained a sound investing policy of consistent investment.

Recommended Articles

2
Leave a Reply

avatar
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
2 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
SunKen Faulkenberry Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Ken Faulkenberry
Guest

Kevin – you are one of my favorite writer. Thanks for another informative aritle. However have to disagree with your statement “it can be hard to know when stocks are over or underpriced”. I agree that no one can or should try top pick short term tops and bottoms. But we CAN access the risk of the stock market by it’s valuations. Those of us who avoided the outrageous stock valuations of 2000 and 2007 were able to produce superior rates of return by not losing a major chunk of our portfolio. Anyone that was paying attention in the spring… Read more »

Sun
Guest
Sun

What is the average years people work with a 401k? 20 to 65? it’d be interesting to see index performance for forty five years where we invest 10% of our income every month with adjustments for cost of inflation, raises, and sometimes losing a job. In any event, ten year horizon seems too short. I’m just interested in index performance not individual stocks.

The S&P 500 Index Historical Returns

by Kevin Mulligan time to read: 3 min
2