Moolanomy
Personal Finance. Investing. Wealth Building.

Mutual Fund Double Whammy

By Pinyo • Oct 24th, 2007 • Category: Investing, Taxes

I just got hammered by a mutual fund double whammy. Since I bought my SSgA Tuckerman Active REIT (SSREX), it lost nearly 6%, then the fund distributed $2.9418 per share last Friday. The end result? The fund is now down almost 20% and I will have to pay capital gains tax on the distribution! Overall, I should have been more careful about having mutual funds in my non-tax sheltered account.

Mutual Funds

Photo from Wikipedia

What is a mutual fund double whammy?

A mutual fund double whammy occurs when:

  1. The investor is losing money, because the mutual fund price dropped below the original purchase price (this is the first whammy).
  2. The mutual fund then distributes its capital gains, and the investor has to pay capital gains tax on the distribution (this is the double whammy).

What am I doing about it?

  1. I decided to cut my losses early and sold SSREX.
  2. I used the money to buy Vanguard REIT Index ETF (VNQ) and Vanguard Pacific Stock ETF (VPL)

These changes helped me accomplishes several things:

  1. Capture the 20% loss from SSREX, which I can use as a tax write off against other capital gains, including the distribution.
  2. Reduce my real estate exposure from 15% to 8.5%, which I think is more reasonable.
  3. Increase my international equity exposure from 18% to 26%, specifically adding exposure to the Japan and other emerging Asian markets.
  4. Reduce my overall portfolio expense ratio from 0.73% to 0.66% (expenses can kill long-term portfolio performance).

Overall, I didn’t think the loss was a big deal, and believe that the changes will make my portfolio more tax-efficient and diversified.

You can track this particular portfolio at my Covestor page.

Carnivals:

5 Comments

  1. gravatar
    Money Blue Book, 24. October 2007, 9:14

    Yikes…that is a scary drop on the chart…ahem..my recommendation..

    Asia funds, Asia fund, Asia funds :)
    -Raymond

  2. gravatar
    Brip Blap, 24. October 2007, 19:08

    With all due respect to Raymond, diversify, diversify. Asia funds make up about 15% of my portfolio, but I wouldn’t expose myself heavily to them any more than I would heavily expose myself to the US equity market. Diversification and low fees are the best ways to minimize risk and maximize long-term returns. Dump anything with high fees - I did it a few years ago. Painful in the short term but worth it now.

  3. gravatar
    FourPillars, 24. October 2007, 20:30

    Great moves - I’d argue that you had a triple whammy if you include the higher expenses of the mutual fund which will end up being the biggest cost over time.

    Excellent site.

    Mike

  4. gravatar
    Pinyo, 25. October 2007, 6:05

    @Raymond - I found that many international funds invest very little in Japan and Asian markets. Based on another comment, I chose an Asian fund specifically this time.

    @Brip Blap - I agree. I try to limit my investment to no more than 20% in any particular thing. I still have room for improvement though.

    @FourPillars - I sounds like a good plan, I hope it does work out. Anyway, reducing cost should work out better regardless. Now I wish I have the courage to get out of my old mutual funds; I am afraid of capital gains though.

  5. gravatar
    Make Friends, Earn Money, 18. May 2008, 3:28

    Good choice Pinyo, the sign of a good investor is knowing when to cut and run so that you can reinvest elsewhere.

Please share your comment:

Please read our comment policy and guidelines.


Please do not use the name of your site or keywords.

1 blogs that link to this article:

If your trackback does not show in 24 hours, please resend to this trackback URI.

  1. Dividend Dates

Important Notice

I am NOT a financial professional and no content within this website should be considered financial advice. Please consult a certified financial expert before attempting any of the ideas described in this website. Please read the Disclaimer for more information.