<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why It&#8217;s Better to Cut Your Losses Early</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/</link>
	<description>Personal Finance. Investing. Wealth Building.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Make Friends, Earn Money</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/comment-page-1/#comment-10541</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Friends, Earn Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 10:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/#comment-10541</guid>
		<description>Risk assessment in financial markets is always a tricky venture, I like the way you&#039;ve broken this down as invariably it is usually better to cut your losses early.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Risk assessment in financial markets is always a tricky venture, I like the way you&#8217;ve broken this down as invariably it is usually better to cut your losses early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/comment-page-1/#comment-5894</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/#comment-5894</guid>
		<description>Ahh I got it. That&#039;s a good point. I see that I&#039;m still relating to the high position, the $1k by your example, and not the new position. That&#039;s what I have to work from at that point, this is good, luv learning stuff like this, thanks Pinyo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh I got it. That&#8217;s a good point. I see that I&#8217;m still relating to the high position, the $1k by your example, and not the new position. That&#8217;s what I have to work from at that point, this is good, luv learning stuff like this, thanks Pinyo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinyo</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/comment-page-1/#comment-5893</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/#comment-5893</guid>
		<description>Frank - welcome to Moolanomy. There is no additional cost per se. The point of the table is that many new investors mistakenly believe that 50% loss can be recouped by 50% gain, when in fact that&#039;s not true.

If your $1,000 position lost 50%, then it&#039;s currently at $500. A gain of 50% on $500 will bring it up to only $750, not $1,000.

I hope that&#039;s clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank &#8211; welcome to Moolanomy. There is no additional cost per se. The point of the table is that many new investors mistakenly believe that 50% loss can be recouped by 50% gain, when in fact that&#8217;s not true.</p>
<p>If your $1,000 position lost 50%, then it&#8217;s currently at $500. A gain of 50% on $500 will bring it up to only $750, not $1,000.</p>
<p>I hope that&#8217;s clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/comment-page-1/#comment-5892</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/#comment-5892</guid>
		<description>That table is great but I don&#039;t understand what&#039;s behind the numbers. What is causing the additional amount needed to breakeven? If I&#039;m holding onto a stock that dropped 50%, where is the additional cost?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That table is great but I don&#8217;t understand what&#8217;s behind the numbers. What is causing the additional amount needed to breakeven? If I&#8217;m holding onto a stock that dropped 50%, where is the additional cost?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Friends, Earn Money</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/comment-page-1/#comment-5063</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Friends, Earn Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/#comment-5063</guid>
		<description>my personal view is that it depends on the level of risk you are willing to expose yourself to. I personally see stocks and shares as a medium to long term investment and traditionally stock markets always follow an upward trend if you are willing to hang in their long enough. I think that as you get older it is probably worth reducing your exposure and investing in government bonds, but as i&#039;m still in my early thirties i&#039;m happy at ride out the tough times, however tempting it is to sell. Interesting post though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my personal view is that it depends on the level of risk you are willing to expose yourself to. I personally see stocks and shares as a medium to long term investment and traditionally stock markets always follow an upward trend if you are willing to hang in their long enough. I think that as you get older it is probably worth reducing your exposure and investing in government bonds, but as i&#8217;m still in my early thirties i&#8217;m happy at ride out the tough times, however tempting it is to sell. Interesting post though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinyo</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/comment-page-1/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>Mark - I think it all depends on the particular stock. You will have to do a due diligence and see what level of loss you are comfortable with. As you can see from the chart, I think it make sense to cut it at around 20% loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; I think it all depends on the particular stock. You will have to do a due diligence and see what level of loss you are comfortable with. As you can see from the chart, I think it make sense to cut it at around 20% loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/comment-page-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>How would I be able to apply this towards dividend paying stocks (I have a few that are DRIPS) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would I be able to apply this towards dividend paying stocks (I have a few that are DRIPS) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Web Favorites &#187; Finance and Fat</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/comment-page-1/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Web Favorites &#187; Finance and Fat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>[...] Cut those losses! @ Moolanomy Great little chart that shows how much your investment would have to gain in order to break even after it goes down. I couldn&#8217;t agree more and I almost always put in a 20% stop-loss order when I buy individual stocks. Of course, you can always decide to hold on through a decline because you are right and the Street is wrong, but hopefully looking at this chart will help you to get out quickly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cut those losses! @ Moolanomy Great little chart that shows how much your investment would have to gain in order to break even after it goes down. I couldn&#8217;t agree more and I almost always put in a 20% stop-loss order when I buy individual stocks. Of course, you can always decide to hold on through a decline because you are right and the Street is wrong, but hopefully looking at this chart will help you to get out quickly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinyo</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/comment-page-1/#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>@John - Thanks. I will look it up.

@Money Blue Book - That&#039;s another way to look at it.

@Mrs. Micah - Index is a good start, but to achieve even better result try asset allocation with different types of index funds (or better yet ETFs) and rebalance at least once a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John &#8211; Thanks. I will look it up.</p>
<p>@Money Blue Book &#8211; That&#8217;s another way to look at it.</p>
<p>@Mrs. Micah &#8211; Index is a good start, but to achieve even better result try asset allocation with different types of index funds (or better yet ETFs) and rebalance at least once a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/comment-page-1/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/255/why-its-better-to-cut-your-losses-early/#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s hard not to hope that it&#039;ll at least get a bit better, or that the slump is the dark before the storm. Hence why I plan to stick with such investments as Vanguard&#039;s S&amp;P 500 index.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard not to hope that it&#8217;ll at least get a bit better, or that the slump is the dark before the storm. Hence why I plan to stick with such investments as Vanguard&#8217;s S&amp;P 500 index.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
