
In the credit card world, scam operators are taking money from innocent customers without adding value, misrepresenting claims and simply performing shoddy service. Fortunately, customers have an avenue to complain and the FTC has also taken pretty tough actions. Below are some examples of the actions that the FTC has taken against some shady companies. After reviewing these examples, you will realize a common thread among these cases and at the end, I would like to conclude by making a few points on how to avoid being susceptible to such scams. So let’s begin.
CompuCredit is a company that issues sub-prime credit cards (i.e., credit cards for bad credit folks). Below are some of the charges (which they eventually settled) made by the FTC.
The FTC charged CompuCredit for deceptive marketing of their Visa credit cards to consumers with subprime credit ratings. These Visa Cards, which include the Aspire Visa credit card and the Aspen credit card, were marketed in such way to make consumers believe that they would get a credit card with $300 credit limit and with no up-front fees. Instead, CompuCredit immediately charges consumers as much as $185 in fees that it did not adequately disclose. These fees left consumers with as little as $115 in available credit. These fees include:
CompuCredit also marketed to consumers with slightly higher credit scores its Visa credit card offering up to $3,250 in available credit. CompuCredit failed to disclose adequately, that half of the available credit would be withheld for the first 90 days. CompuCredit also failed to disclose that for the first 90 days, the company would monitor consumers’ purchases, and might reduce their credit limit based on an undisclosed behavioral scoring model.
This one was the worse of all. CompuCredit and Jefferson Capital marketed a Visa credit card to consumers with charged-off debt. They represented that the consumers’ old debt balance would be immediately transferred to the card and reported to consumer reporting agencies as paid in full. Consumers who accepted the offer, however, were immediately enrolled in a debt repayment plan and did not receive a Visa card until they paid 25 percent to 50 percent of their charged-off debt.
The FTC has also targeted scores of credit repair firms for deceptive marketing and business practices. Late last year, the FTC cracked down on 33 firms offering credit repair services. Most of these firms made the following outrageous claims:
Hargravecard.com was charged for deceptively offering an advance-fee credit card for $100 to $300, by claiming that applicants are guaranteed for a credit limit ranging from $500 to $10,000. What they did was against the Telemarketing Sales Rule because they received a fee in advance of consumers obtaining a credit card. This was also against the FTC Act by falsely telling consumers that they will receive a credit card after paying a fee. Still people fall for these.
Another firm Advantage Credit Repair LLC advertised on myadvantagecredit.com and Yellow Pages ads. They claimed that “they will never charge a large up front fee or make you wait a long period of time to refund your money if we do not get results. You WILL see results in 60 days, or your money will be refunded in full “. But they actually charge $495 per person of which $219 or $269 was required in advance! The FTC found out that most of their refund request was denied!
If you look at this case carefully, you will realize that there are a few common threads here.
These practices are not just confined to the credit card industry. But instead, it is practices in so many businesses. For example, take cable companies. How many bait and switch tactics do you see on TV ads everyday? Get bundled service for only $X for 6 months, but what they don’t tell you is all the fees after that. Another example is weight loss programs. Just look at the promises and testimonials. Lose X pounds in 3 months. Gimme a break. How about get rich quick stock trading programs? Many of us fall for these too easily.
Well, I guess that is the six million dollar question.
We all make mistakes. The important thing is that we learn and be careful as a consumer.

All posts by Mr Credit Card
Comment Rules: Constructive criticism is welcomed. Please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name or URL, as the latter comes off like spam and I'll most likely delete your comment. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation! Here's our comment policy and guidelines.
If your trackback does not show in 24 hours, please resend to this trackback URI.
| High Interest Savings Accounts | 1.51% |
| High Yield CDs (1-year) | 1.75% |
| High Yield Checking Accounts | 1.46% |
| Best Credit Card | TrueEarnings® |
| 0% APR Balance Transfer | 6 mo |
| Lowest Interest Rate | 9.75% |
| Best Cash Back Reward | 5% |
This site contains information about third party products and services, such as credit card offers, online banking, discount brokers, and credit score services. While we endeavor to ensure that the information presented on this site is accurate at the time of publication, any offers and rates shown on Moolanomy can and do change without notice. Visit the official site of the offer for up-to-date information.
For additional information, please review our Terms and Conditions.
Very informative article. An alternative to using your credit card to cover instant expenses is to take a short-term loan.
This may be the more conservative approach to this system but a good rule of thumb is to simply only get credit cards from companies backed by a bank you’ve heard of. Chase, Citi, BofA, etc…
These banks have too much to lose to try and employ these kinds of deceptive practices on a regular basis. If you can’t get approved for a card at one of these places then it is likely that you should not have a credit card right now.
Not everyone will do this of course so I’m thankful for the FTC protecting the little guy.
Great article – and the old adage is correct for these scam companies : If it sounds too good to be true, it IS. Unfortunately, we humans are prone to look for the easy-way-out and can rationalize our choices to ‘believe’ or ‘trust’ in our own logic/judgment thinking that these kinds of scams aren’t going to happen to us! The companies in the FTC complaint are the most egregious violators – there are other companies (like Orchard Bank, a division of HSBC) who used to charge ‘account maintenance fees’ that would equate to $240 dollars/year – essentially just for the service of reporting to the credit bureau…But wait! To weakonomist’s point regarding name-brand banks – that’s the same thing Chase tried to do to its customers last fall until one of the states’ atty gen. stepped up and helped put an end to that practice…
Very Good Information! There is so much BS out on the net that I appreciate when someone brings good info to light for people who are trying to navigate the shark infested waters of credit!
I even put a post on my blog to this very article… http://www.crushingthecreditbu.....umers.html
Keep up the good work!
Mark