<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: August 2007 Net Worth Review (+0.19%)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moolanomy.com/126/august-2007-net-worth-review-020/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/126/august-2007-net-worth-review-020/</link>
	<description>Personal Finance. Investing. Wealth Building.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:14:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/126/august-2007-net-worth-review-020/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 01:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/126/august-2007-net-worth-review-020/#comment-431</guid>
		<description>Considering the weak real estate market and stock market craziness, I think you did well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the weak real estate market and stock market craziness, I think you did well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinyo</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/126/august-2007-net-worth-review-020/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 18:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/126/august-2007-net-worth-review-020/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Lynnae and Eric.

Regarding, ETFs vs. Funds, that&#039;s exactly why. It is advantageous over long term to save even 0.25% on expense, as long as you limit the number of trades. You can do the math on $10,000 investment and see that a fund that charges 1% expense ratio means $100 per year. That&#039;s a lot of trades using my discount broker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Lynnae and Eric.</p>
<p>Regarding, ETFs vs. Funds, that&#8217;s exactly why. It is advantageous over long term to save even 0.25% on expense, as long as you limit the number of trades. You can do the math on $10,000 investment and see that a fund that charges 1% expense ratio means $100 per year. That&#8217;s a lot of trades using my discount broker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/126/august-2007-net-worth-review-020/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 17:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/126/august-2007-net-worth-review-020/#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Looks like a pretty good month considering the volatility the market had at times. 

As for ETF vs. Mutual Funds, I&#039;m finding that it seems to be more advantageous to invest in the ETFs (as long as you aren&#039;t buying and selling frequently and getting hit with brokerage fees). Is that why you chose the Vanguard ETFs vs. their similar mutual funds?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a pretty good month considering the volatility the market had at times. </p>
<p>As for ETF vs. Mutual Funds, I&#8217;m finding that it seems to be more advantageous to invest in the ETFs (as long as you aren&#8217;t buying and selling frequently and getting hit with brokerage fees). Is that why you chose the Vanguard ETFs vs. their similar mutual funds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynnae @ Being Frugal</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/126/august-2007-net-worth-review-020/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynnae @ Being Frugal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 15:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/126/august-2007-net-worth-review-020/#comment-411</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re doing great! Your numbers are going in a positive direction!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re doing great! Your numbers are going in a positive direction!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
