<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beating the S&amp;P 500, part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moolanomy.com/119/beating-the-sp-500-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/119/beating-the-sp-500-part-2/</link>
	<description>Personal Finance. Investing. Wealth Building.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 01:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pinyo</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/119/beating-the-sp-500-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/119/beating-the-sp-500-part-2/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Did some more research. What I&#039;ve used is actually Holding Period Return (HPR), not Time Weighted Return (TWR).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did some more research. What I&#8217;ve used is actually Holding Period Return (HPR), not Time Weighted Return (TWR).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinyo</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/119/beating-the-sp-500-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinyo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 14:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/119/beating-the-sp-500-part-2/#comment-511</guid>
		<description>Jonathan - welcome to Moolanomy. I actually didn&#039;t know what dollar-weighted return and time-weighted return are and had to Google it.

I assume your question applies to how I measure my portfolio performance and not the S&amp;P. If I read the definitions correctly, I used time-weighted return. Basically, I treat any net new money added for the entire year as if it&#039;s been there for the whole year. 

So, if I add the money every 2 weeks and it&#039;s a trending up year most of my money did not have as much time to grow that year and will underperform.

Does this answer your question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan &#8211; welcome to Moolanomy. I actually didn&#8217;t know what dollar-weighted return and time-weighted return are and had to Google it.</p>
<p>I assume your question applies to how I measure my portfolio performance and not the S&#038;P. If I read the definitions correctly, I used time-weighted return. Basically, I treat any net new money added for the entire year as if it&#8217;s been there for the whole year. </p>
<p>So, if I add the money every 2 weeks and it&#8217;s a trending up year most of my money did not have as much time to grow that year and will underperform.</p>
<p>Does this answer your question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.moolanomy.com/119/beating-the-sp-500-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-504</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 08:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moolanomy.com/119/beating-the-sp-500-part-2/#comment-504</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a bit confused. Are you using your dollar-weighted return, or time-weighted return here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a bit confused. Are you using your dollar-weighted return, or time-weighted return here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
