Beating the S&P 500, part 2

In “Beating the S&P 500, part 1,” I showed you my my investment performance that beaten the S&P 500. In this post, I will show you another way to look at these numbers and reveal how I managed the feat.

Here is a different look at the numbers

The following table shows how $10,000 invested in my 401k (column B), VFINX (column C), S&P 500 (column D), and IRA (column E) grew at different pace.

Beating the S&P500 Growth of $10,000

Chart updated October 1, 2007

Graphically,

Beat the S&P500 Chart

How did I do it?

You might be disappointed to learn that I did not have any investment secret to share. The performance you see here was the result of sacrifice, patience, and discipline to stick to a plan.

Here are the factors I believe contributed to the superior performance:

S&P 500 Chart with CAGR

Well, that is pretty much how I have been beating the S&P 500 in a nutshell. I am still working on refining my stock picking skill, which I have been getting mixed results. For example, I have picked winners like Staples (SPLS), but also got some losers like Flemings (FLMIQ) and eToys (ETYS).

I would like to hear your comment. Thank you.

Pinyo
Pinyo is the brain behind Moolanomy personal finance blog and a few other web sites. If you like this article, please subscribe for free daily email updates.

All posts by Pinyo

Get Free Email Updates

emailLike this article? Enter your email address and click "Subscribe" to get the latest articles sent to your email for free. Your email will only be used for this daily update and you can unsubscribe anytime.

Click here to learn more about this free subscription

3 Comments

  1. gravatar
    Jonathan
    September 9, 2007, 1:57

    I’m a bit confused. Are you using your dollar-weighted return, or time-weighted return here?

  2. gravatar
    Pinyo
    September 9, 2007, 7:54

    Jonathan – welcome to Moolanomy. I actually didn’t know what dollar-weighted return and time-weighted return are and had to Google it.

    I assume your question applies to how I measure my portfolio performance and not the S&P. If I read the definitions correctly, I used time-weighted return. Basically, I treat any net new money added for the entire year as if it’s been there for the whole year.

    So, if I add the money every 2 weeks and it’s a trending up year most of my money did not have as much time to grow that year and will underperform.

    Does this answer your question?

  3. gravatar
    Pinyo
    September 9, 2007, 10:55

    Did some more research. What I’ve used is actually Holding Period Return (HPR), not Time Weighted Return (TWR).

Please share your comment:

Comment Rules:
Constructive criticism is fine, but if you're rude, I'll delete your comment. Please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name or URL, as the latter comes off like spam and I'll most likely delete your comment. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation! Here's our comment policy and guidelines.


Please do not use the name of your site or keywords.

Banking and Investing

Your Credit Score

Best Credit Card Offers

Ask the M-Network

What's hot on PF Buzz?

Relevant Articles From Other Sites

Sponsored Links

Work From Home
Important Notice: I am NOT a financial professional and no content within this website should be considered financial advice. Please consult a certified financial expert before attempting any of the ideas described in this website. Please read the Disclaimer for more information.

Archives By Year

2007, 2008, and 2009

Personal Finance Blogs

A-F, G-L, M-R, and S-Z.
NETWORK
Proud member of the
Moolanomy Answers
Do you have a financial question? Join Moolanomy Answers today, ask your question, and get your answers. Sign up before July 15th for a chance to win iPod Shuffle!
Close