Beating the S&P 500, part 1

By Pinyo, on August 29, 2007

You may have heard the phrase “beat the market. ” In this case, the market usually refers to the S&P 500 index. There are other U.S. indices such as, DJIA, NASDAQ 100, NASDAQ Composite, Russell 2000, Wilshire 5000, and many other domestic and international ones. However, the S&P 500 is by far the most used benchmark for investment performance. It is a good benchmark because it represents a well diversified portfolio of large and medium, as well as value and growth, stocks in many industries.

Why do I compare my investment performance against the S&P 500?

An investment that returned 15% sounds spectacular. However, if this happened in 2003 when the S&P 500 returned 28%, then it’s terrible. By comparing against the S&P 500, we get a more accurate measure of the investment true performance.

When I first started, I made several mistakes; including comparing my investment performance against a fixed number like 10%. After a few years, I learned that it’s better to compare against the index — and have been doing it since.

Why is beating the S&P 500 a big deal?

You may also have heard people talk about how hard it is to beat the market. Let us look at the Vanguard 500 Index (VFINX):

• It is classified as a Large Blend fund according to Morningstar
• There are currently 2,170 mutual funds in this Large Blend category
• This year VFINX ranks 38.99%. In other words, it performs better than 1,324 funds that are actively managed by professional investors!
• Its expense ratio is only 0.18% compared to category average of 1.13%

The last two bullets are the main reasons why so many people choose to invest their money in index funds. As such, beating the S&P 500 is actually quite an accomplishment for any stock investor.

Show me the numbers!

You can see from the table below (column H) that my 401(k) managed to beat the S&P 500 from the end of 2000 through the end of 2006. I do expect to beat, or at least come close to, the S&P 500 by the end of 2007.

Note: Prior to 2000, my 401k underperformed because I was over-allocated in my company stock

Chart updated October 1, 2007

A few notes:

• Column E — S&P 500 performance reflected index growth plus dividend yield; using last trading day of the year data from Yahoo!Finance Historical Prices.
  
• Column G — My 401k performance discounted my company matching contribution; otherwise the return would be about 1-2% higher
• Column I — My IRA did not perform as well, due to late contributions and lack of certain advantages that I will share later. As for contributions, I ended up contributing in April of the following year instead of right at the beginning of the contribution year. This is something I am planning to correct.

Wow, this is becoming a long post. I will stop right here and part 2 will be ready for tomorrow morning.

Next: Beating the S&P 500, part 2

Read more about

Get free updates

    via Twitter
    via Facebook
    via RSS or Email

Share this article

• 
• 
• 
• 
• Share

Pinyo is the brain behind Moolanomy personal finance blog and a few other web sites. If you like this article, please subscribe for free daily email updates.

All posts by Pinyo

Please share your comment:

Comment Rules: Constructive criticism is welcomed. Please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name or URL, as the latter comes off like spam and I'll most likely delete your comment. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation! Here's our comment policy and guidelines.

2 blogs that link to this article:

If your trackback does not show in 24 hours, please resend to this trackback URI.

1. Sunday Morning Link Love 9/2/07 | I've Paid For This Twice Already...
2. Guest Post: The Weak Dollar is Killing Americans’ Wealth - Consumerism Commentary